Transparent AI predictions
≈2M visits/mo
TL;DR — KickOracle vs FootyStats
FootyStats is a superb raw-stats platform with a public API, but its predictions come with no published accuracy and its best data is behind a subscription. KickOracle is model-first: it publishes a full backtest — Brier score, calibration curve, and limitations — and adds World Cup 2026 squad, head-to-head, and player depth. Pick FootyStats to dig through numbers yourself; pick KickOracle to have a transparent model do it for you.
At a Glance
5 categories favour KickOracle, 2 favour FootyStats. Here is the honest breakdown.
Full backtest on /accuracy — Brier, log-loss, calibration
Historical hit-rate %, no falsifiable backtest
Curated, model-relevant metrics
Exhaustive xG / BTTS / trend tables
Documented Dixon–Coles model
Stats shown; prediction model undocumented
Squad chemistry, H2H, player intel & sims
General league stats
World Cup 2026 + major leagues
Hundreds of leagues
Free core + one-time passes, no subscription
Best data behind premium subscription
Public API (/developers)
Public API
Model synthesises the read for you
You interpret the tables yourself
The Real Difference: We Show Our Receipts
Most prediction sites — FootyStats included — hand you a number and ask you to trust it. KickOracle does the opposite. Every prediction is built on a Dixon–Coles probabilistic goals model, and we publish how it actually performs: a backtest with Brier scores against model and market benchmarks, a calibration curve showing whether our probabilities hold up, and a written list of the model's limitations.
You can read all of it before you trust a single prediction. That is the difference between a confident number and a verifiable one.
See our published accuracy →What FootyStats does well
- +Exceptionally deep stats — xG, BTTS%, over/under, corners, cards and form tables — across hundreds of leagues.
- +Best-in-class "[team] vs [team] stats" head-to-head pages.
- +A public API and exportable data; genuinely useful for research.
- +Strong organic footprint and topical authority.
Where FootyStats falls short
- −Predictions are secondary to raw stats; the forecasting model has no published Brier score, calibration curve, or limitations.
- −The most useful data sits behind a premium subscription paywall.
- −A data-dense, utilitarian interface — you do the interpretation yourself.
- −Not World Cup 2026-specialised: no squad chemistry, player intel, or tournament simulations.
Use FootyStats if…
Stats researchers who want raw numbers — xG, BTTS, trends — across many leagues, and prefer to form their own view from the tables.
Use KickOracle if…
People who want a transparent model doing the synthesis for them — with a published accuracy record — plus World Cup 2026 depth, rather than tables to interpret alone.
Pricing
Free core predictions; optional one-time passes from $2.99 a match (full tournament $49). No subscription.
See pricing →Freemium — free tier + premium subscription (annual)
The Bottom Line
FootyStats is the better tool if you want a vast warehouse of stats to mine. KickOracle is the better tool if you want a model that turns those numbers into a forecast and then shows you, honestly, how often that forecast is right — without a subscription.
KickOracle vs FootyStats — Frequently Asked Questions
Is KickOracle a good alternative to FootyStats?
Yes, if you want a model rather than a spreadsheet. FootyStats is excellent for raw stats, but its predictions carry no published accuracy and its best data needs a subscription. KickOracle gives you a documented model with a falsifiable backtest (Brier score, calibration curve, limitations) on its accuracy page, free core access, and World Cup 2026 depth FootyStats does not offer.
How accurate are FootyStats predictions?
FootyStats shows historical hit-rates for some prediction types, but it does not publish an independently calibrated metric (Brier score or calibration curve), the sample, or the model behind the picks — so accuracy cannot be audited. KickOracle publishes all of that, including where its model is weak.
What is the difference between KickOracle and FootyStats?
FootyStats hands you the raw numbers and lets you draw conclusions; KickOracle runs a documented Dixon–Coles model that turns numbers into probabilities and publishes how well those probabilities hold up. FootyStats wins on sheer stat depth and league count; KickOracle wins on a transparent, graded model and World Cup 2026 depth.
Is KickOracle free like FootyStats?
FootyStats is freemium — a free tier plus a premium subscription for its best data. KickOracle's core predictions are free, with optional one-time passes (from $2.99 a match, $49 the full tournament) and no recurring subscription.
Which is better for the World Cup 2026, KickOracle or FootyStats?
KickOracle — it is built for the tournament, with squad-chemistry indexes, head-to-head records, player intel, and group simulations, all sitting on a published model track record. FootyStats will show World Cup stats but treats the tournament like any other set of fixtures.
See the difference for yourself
Read the model's track record, then explore the World Cup 2026 predictions it powers.
Comparison reflects publicly available information about FootyStats at the time of writing. FootyStats is a trademark of its respective owner; this page is an independent comparison and is not affiliated with or endorsed by FootyStats.
All prediction site comparisons